Technologist

Books 2018

I started 2018 by completing “The Great Convergence”, an insightful account of how the share of world income going to today’s wealthy nations soared from 20% to 70%, with industrial revolution in 1820 till internet revolution around 1990. And how the combination of high tech with low wages propelled industrialization in developing nations and deindustrialization in developed nations during the last 30 years has led to a reversing of this trend. China and India have become new economic super powers after several years of growth rates far exceeding that of developed nations, resulting in convergence of the share of world income in line with population.

As I looked for the next books to read, I resolved to read recent books and my searches led to Yuval Noah Harari’s classics – Sapiens and Homo Deus. I could not stop talking about these books as you can see from my earlier blog.

I followed it with “Principles: Life and Work” by Ray Dalio, the legendary American investor and hedge fund manager. We tend to get carried away by b-school promises to provide secret formulae for career success by pursuing one of their myriad programs. From the lives of people like Ray Dalio, it is enlightening to see that pursuing our vision with discipline, focus and perseverance is the key to success!

After a few books with heavy insightful content, I switched to some relatively light reading with “The Upstarts: How Uber, Airbnb and the Killer Companies of the New Silicon Valley are Changing the World” by Brad Stone and “Crushing It!: How Great Entrepreneurs Build Their Business and Influence—and How You Can, Too” by Gary Vaynerchuk. I revived my Twitter account after Gary’s book but could not sustain it with my schedule.

Then I encountered one of the most profound books I ever read – “Thinking, Fast and Slow” by Daniel Kahneman. I summarized my high level learnings from this classic here.

After the intense read, I switched once again to a couple of easy reads in “Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins” by Garry Kasparov and “When: The Scientific Secrets of Perfect Timing” by Daniel Pink.

While reading reviews on “When”, I stumbled upon “Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ” by Daniel Goleman. As I read the book, there were innumerable OMG moments. This book reinforced my belief in science, explaining every conceivable action by humans. I still need to summarize my learnings from this one for future reference, but quickly jotted down an irresistible learning of being an artful critique in a blog. I started this reading this book in September and am yet to finish as I write this blog. But such has been my work schedule towards the end of the year.

As I was slowly progressing through “Emotional Intelligence”, a geek friend referred “Physics of the Impossible: A Scientific Exploration of the World of Phasers, Force Fields, Teleportation and Time Travel” by Michio Kaku. It gives a peek into the future – the scientists and engineers who breakthrough these barriers will be next-gen conquerors of the world!

That’s all I could cover in 2018 and started the new year with “Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup” by John Carreyrou and Yuval Noah Harari’s next book “21 Lessons for the 21st Century” in the backlog. Happy Reading!

Physics of the Impossible: A Scientific Exploration of the World of Phasers, Force Fields, Teleportation and Time Travel Michio Kaku
Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ Daniel Goleman
When: The Scientific Secrets of Perfect Timing Daniel H. Pink
Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins Garry Kasparov
Thinking, Fast and Slow Daniel Kahneman
Crushing It!: How Great Entrepreneurs Build Their Business and Influence—and How You Can, Too Gary Vaynerchuk
The Upstarts: How Uber, Airbnb and the Killer Companies of the New Silicon Valley are Changing the World Brad Stone
Principles: Life and Work Ray Dalio
Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow Yuval Noah Harari
Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Yuval Noah Harari
The Great Convergence Richard Baldwin

The Artful Critique

I am reading a classic on Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman, easily among the most profound books I encountered. I usually finish a book, assimilate the contents and start talking about them. But the chapter on “Managing with Heart” and the section “The Artful Critique” in particular holds immense relevance to a challenge encountered all the time that I am talking about it as soon as I read it!

As a leader and manager, one needs to pass critical feedback when an individual has not delivered good enough results. No one intentionally does a bad job, which makes it natural for the person receiving critical feedback to feel it is unwarranted. And worse, also feel that the person passing the feedback has a bias! To quote from “The Speed of Trust” by Steven Covey, “We judge ourselves by our intentions and others by their behavior”. When critical feedback is not received well, it is likely that the intention of feedback was not understood and the behavior was interpreted as biased.

This is where “Emotional Intelligence” provides some insightful advice quoting Harry Levinson. When you have to pass critical feedback, consider the following aspects:

  • Be specific – pick a significant event, an event that illustrates a key problem that needs changing or a pattern of deficiency, such as the inability to do certain parts of a job well. It demoralizes people to just hear that they are doing “something” wrong without knowing what the specifics are so they can change. Many a times, the feedback becomes a personal attack – calling someone stupid or incompetent that makes the recipient defensive and no longer receptive to suggestions. It serves well to stay specific and issue based!
  • Offer a solution – feedback should also point to a way to fix the problem. Otherwise it leaves the recipient frustrated, demoralized or demotivated. It can also get to “my manager does not know the solution but expects me to find one”, questioning the capability of the manager.
  • Be present – feedback is most effective face to face and in private. People who are uncomfortable giving a criticism are likely to ease the burden on themselves by doing it at a distance, such as email or phone. In person or over video makes it more personal and credible.
  • Be sensitive – this is a call for empathy, for being attuned to the impact of what ones says. Managers who have little empathy, Levinson points out, are most prone to giving feedback in a hurtful manner. The net effect of such criticism is destructive, creating an emotional backlash of resentment, bitterness, defensiveness and distance.

This advice provides a template for leaders and managers to make feedback sessions more productive and useful. However, the success of this approach also depends on the recipient being open to feedback and suggestions. If the recipient is not open and feels “I am doing fine but my manager does not understand”, the situation is likely to deteriorate irrespective of how well the critical feedback is passed. This should not stop one from providing timely critical feedback and the manager does not even have a choice as providing timely feedback is an integral part of the job! So, be empathetic and do the best while providing timely critical feedback considering above aspects. If it does not work, seek help from appropriate authority!

Results matter

When we think about athletics, the sprinter who is likely to come to our mind is Usain Bolt, even a year after he retired from the track. He is widely considered to be the greatest sprinter of all time having won the 100 m, 200 m and 4 × 100 m relay at three consecutive Olympic Games. It is an amazing conversion ratio of 100% that makes him the greatest among the greats!

Being an Indian, I need to give some examples from cricket and am glad to be writing this blog post at a time when Indian cricket is in ascendency for more than a decade. What would be some of the most famous moments in Indian cricket? Lovers of Test cricket will mention the magnificent VVS Laxman Kolkata innings of 281 against Australia in 2001, followers of one day cricket will remember the first World Cup win of 1983 or the last one of 2011 based on the generation they belong, Sachin Tendulkar fans will recollect Sharjah innings from 1998 and MS Dhoni supporters will vouch for his leadership skills citing the inaugural T20 world cup win in 2007. Now, what is common across all these reminiscences? – the RESULT!

Imagine how we will remember the same individuals or events if:

  • Usain Bolt missed winning some of these events due to false starts or petty illness like fever, cold or upset stomach.
  • Despite Sachin’s genius innings, India failed to cross the finish line in Sharjah 1998 finals as it happened the very next year in a Test match at Chennai
  • Sreesanth failed to cling on to Misbah-ul-Haq’s scoop over short fine leg during the T20 finals.

In sports as in any aspect of life, there is always an element of chance or luck that determines the final outcome. So, how does luck work? I found this statement from Garry Kasparov’s “Deep Thinking” about luck to be apt: “In nearly any competitive endeavor, you have to be damned good before luck can be of any use to you at all”.

And I am a believer of this quote by Roald Amundsen, a Norwegian explorer who led the first Antarctic expedition to reach the South Pole in 1911: “Victory awaits him who has everything in order — luck, people call it. Defeat is certain for him who has neglected to take the necessary precautions in time; this is called bad luck”.

When we don’t achieve the best possible results, there is always a reason – I call it an excuse. Some people look outwards and attribute any failure to other people or external factors while they did not do their job well enough BUT readily look inwards to attribute all success to themselves though they did not contribute sufficiently! They forget that people around them will be aware of the reality and will not respect them for such actions. Even if they may get away with such irresponsible behavior in the near term, they will be held accountable in the long term. And the longer they manage to get away, the greater the downfall will be!

Jim Collins in his book “Good to Great” attributes success of organizations to Level 5 leadership and says “Level 5 leaders look out the window to attribute success to factors other than themselves. When things go poorly, however, they look in the mirror and blame themselves, taking full responsibility“.

Overall, I have learnt that:

  • Diligent planning and flawless execution are essential to achieve great results.
  • When expected results are not delivered, first ask if we have done everything within our control. In my several years of several failures, I was always able to find something that I could have done differently to increase the chances for success. This learning helped me improve and produce better results in future.
  • Avoid attributing lack of results to external factors. Though we may feel justified, we will come across as someone unwilling to take responsibility for our outcomes. And multiple such occurrences will lead to our losing respect and trust.
  • Many environments today reward effort even when results are not achieved. This will encourage mediocrity and lead to an environment that does not produce required results as people will limit themselves to spending long inefficient hours and expect rewards for the time spent.
  • While EFFORTS are important, it is RESULTS that ultimately matters. Appreciate effort but hold people accountable for results!

Options Thinking & The Last Responsible Moment

As intelligent humans with mental faculties honed by years of training and experience, we subconsciously know the good from the bad. We usually make good decisions in line with our long term goals. But there are times when we regret our decisions – for either making or NOT making them. It can be related to an investment or a property or a job switch or so many other things in life. We learn from our mistakes and get better. In the process, we update our mental models to assess situations better and make smarter decisions in the future.

In this blog post, I will share my understanding of two tools from Mary & Tom Poppendieck’s “Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit”. They are “Options Thinking” and “The Last Responsible Moment”. While the book is focused on software development, these two tools form a potent combination that can help us analyze situations objectively and make decisions that are aligned to any goals in our life.

Lets start with some definitions:

  • Option (in financial domain) – A contract that offers the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell the underlying asset at an agreed-upon price during a certain period of time or on a specific date (https://www.investopedia.com)
  • Last Responsible Moment – The instant in which the cost of the delay of a decision surpasses the benefit of delay; or the moment when failing to take a decision eliminates an important alternative (https://www.leanconstruction.org)

While option has a similar (and simpler) English definition, I chose to use the definition from my professional domain, as it  highlights the right vs obligation connotation. And we buy a financial option by paying a premium.

There are several situations that highlight options thinking:

  • Book non-refundable airline tickets at a lower price OR book relatively expensive ones that provide an option to cancel later
  • Reserve hotel rooms at lower rates by paying the entire non-refundable amount upfront OR reserve at higher rates by just providing a valid credit card number with an option to cancel till a cut-off period without incurring any expense
  • An Indian software company that expects US Dollar receivables from clients in the future can encash the proceeds at prevailing exchange rates when it receives them OR hedge against possible future rupee appreciation by buying FX options after paying a premium

In all these cases, the choices in italics are more economical BUT we are committed to them. The price difference between them and the relatively expensive alternatives is the cost of delaying the decision. For example – if we need to cancel our travel, the non-refundable ticket will result in a much bigger loss than the one with cancel option. And one such need to cancel might wipe out all the savings we accumulated over several years by diligently selecting the choice without options!

Does it mean the more expensive alternatives completely protect us from a loss given we have paid a premium? NO. Imagine our travel plan changed but we forgot to cancel the hotel reservation before the cut-off time, then we will be charged for one night. Or Indian Rupee appreciated by 15% against the US Dollar and the FX Option is in the money but the company forgot to exercise it before the expiry date, then the option becomes worthless. These crucial moments when an alternative is eliminated will be the Last Responsible Moment.

So, this is what I have learnt about the process of making decisions that we will not regret later:

  • Set our vision and goals – Different individuals have different priorities and what is important for one need not be the same for another. So, we need to set our own vision based on what we want to achieve in life and define our goals appropriately. This will create clear guiding principles for us and help avoid distractions caused by ubiquitous marketers and ill-intentioned well-wishers.
  • Understand the situation and list out the alternatives – It can take anywhere between a few seconds to several days to identify all possible alternatives that are aligned to our vision. The time it takes depends on the time we have to decide and the amount of learning we need to go through to fully understand the situation. We should avoid going with our gut feel as I have already explained that our gut feel need not necessarily deliver the best results.
  • Decide as late as possible – This is where options thinking comes into play. Some alternatives might appear more expensive in the beginning. But as we progress, we might realize that the cheaper one cannot deliver the required results but will hurt our reputation or even cost our job. It does not mean the costlier alternatives are always the best! It all depends on the situation and we need to decide after analysis if it will be worthwhile to keep our options open by paying a premium.
  • Make the decision – Keeping our options open should not result in analysis paralysis. We should always be cognizant of the last responsible moment and make our decision before we lose the potentially best alternative.

Finally, I see some people NOT wanting to deal with this complexity at all and just go with the flow. This is essentially favoring status quo and might appear to work some times. Remember, the leaders who create history are the ones who take risks and challenge the status quo instead of just going with the flow. If we expect time to automatically provide a solution, we will not be a leader and will likely be letting some one else decide for us!

Net-net, if we want to be a futuristic leader, we cannot just wait for time to provide a magical solution. We need to actively analyze situations to come up with alternatives in line with our vision, keep our options open and decide at the right time!

Let them figure out

As a parent or a manager or even an individual, we become leaders and make decisions from time to time. There are different leadership styles to deal with situations and these two quotes drive my philosophy:

  • Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
  • That which does not kill us makes us stronger – Friedrich Nietzsche

These quotes are in conflict with the widely prevalent leadership style of being over-protective. Being over-protective gives the leader an illusion of control as the leader tends to make most of the decisions. And the team feels happy about having a strong leader who will always back them up irrespective of the situation. And it is more appealing when you consider the possibility of hero worship!

But there are several pitfalls for the team. Teams that are led by over-protective leaders tend to:

  • Be perennially dependent on the leader and cannot act independently
  • Think they will be backed up even if they make mistakes and become reckless
  • Will not understand risk – reward dynamics
  • Do not take accountability for their actions and results
  • Eventually be left unprepared for the future – it is a tough world out there!

Does this mean it is fine NOT to back up our team all the time? Absolutely NO. There will be times when the team needs the leader to back them up to the hilt, particularly when they have put in their best effort but could not achieve expected results due to factors beyond their control.

Teams have to make several decisions every day being fully aware that there is risk involved in each one of them and that they can be judged the wrong way if desired results are not delivered. Failure to back them up when required or reluctance to pick up the battle during critical times will result in the leader losing trust of the team.

So, what can a leader do? Coach people on the basics, let them figure the rest on their own, let them learn through their mistakes and get strong in the process. All of this will build a good team and leadership – continue challenging them and pushing the limits to make them stronger. But when the need arises, step in and support them!

Ultimately, it all boils down to what the situation demands and leaders should use their judgment and decide what should be done – let the team be on their own vs. push them hard vs. step in to support.

Thinking, fast and slow

I have read several thought provoking books but this one by Nobel prize winner Daniel Kahneman gives insights into our very own thought process itself. We keep hearing about stepping back to rethink and are encouraged to “think through” before acting – this book explains why they are required.

All my life, I was under the impression that intuition is a talent and a gift. After reading this book, I realized that we should be careful about our intuition and that common sense typically produces ordinary results!

My biggest learning from this book is that there are two systems that help us think and make decisions:

  • System 1 – the fast paced “automatic operation” or “intuitive thought” driven by amygdala, a primitive part of our brain.
  • System 2 – relatively slow paced “controlled operation” or “deliberate thought” driven by neo-cortex, the most distinctively human feature of our brain.

While invoking system 2 for any decision will ensure thorough analysis and reduce mistakes, we may not always have the luxury of time and energy required for it. So, we will have to rely on intuition for a number of day to day decisions. And this is where understanding the two types of intuition comes in handy.

  • Expert intuition: Thousands of hours of practice leads to expertise – Malcom Gladwell’s “Outliers” explains this well through the 10,000 hour rule. While this rule is contested by some, it is still a good framework for understanding expertise. Now, any situation where we need to make a decision will invariably provide a cue that an expert will sub-consciously detect. This cue gives the expert access to information stored in memory and the information provides the answer. Expert intuition is just recognition!
  • Heuristic intuition: When faced with a difficult question, we often substitute the original question with an easier one without noticing the substitution. The resulting easier question will be one for which we readily have an answer, which will invariably be based on our biases. I have observed many leaders form “perceptions” about people and now I understand it should be because of their heuristic intuition!

Whenever I have an intuition or gut feel nowadays, I ask myself if this is due to expert intuition or if this is influenced by heuristics or biases. Expert intuition is good – in fact, what is the point of earning expertise through hard practice if we are not going to use it! But heuristic intuition is bad, leading to bad decisions that leaders in particular should avoid as it can adversely impact their people! So, the healthy alternate is switch to slower, more deliberate and effortful form of thinking whenever we suspect heuristic intuition.

This book is a beauty and took more than a couple of months for a slow reader like me to complete. It will be a long blog post and will take several hours for me to write about everything I learnt. So, I will summarize with some quick pointers to key concepts:

  • Law of least effort – if there are several ways of achieving the same goal, we will eventually gravitate to the least demanding course of action. Laziness is built deep into out nature.
  • Cognitive Ease – when we are in a good mood, we are likely to be casual and superficial in our thinking. Don’t get “carried away”!
  • Jumping to conclusions is efficient if the conclusions are likely to be correct and the costs of an occasional mistake is acceptable, and if the jump saves much time and effort. It is risky when the situation is unfamiliar and the stakes are high.
  • The law of small numbers – statistics can help when the sample size is large enough and comprehensively representative. Conclusions made based on small numbers will not be prudent as they assume a simpler world than reality and ignore that many facts are due to “chance”.
  • Regression to the mean – whenever someone produces extraordinary and outstanding results, an element of chance is likely to be one of the reasons. Over a period of time, the results will converge towards the average.
  • Illusion of understanding – hindsight information is often misunderstood as prophetic knowledge. A number of books that analyze past events and postulate a recipe for future success have fallen flat over a period of time. A classic example will be “Build to last” – the gap in corporate profitability and stock returns between the outstanding and the less successful firms studied in this book shrank to almost nothing subsequently! How about this? – the CEO of a successful company is likely to be called flexible, methodical and decisive. If the firm slips the next year, the same executive will be called confused, rigid and authoritarian! The same actions can be conveniently depicted in positive or negative terms creating an illusion of profound understanding of the presenter!
  • Prospect theory, loss aversion & the endowment effect – These are profound concepts:
    • Reference points exist – A specific amount of money does not have the same value for everyone. A person earning $1000 a month will be a lot more excited about $100 than someone who earns $10,000 a month. This explains why hikes are measured in % rather than absolute amounts!
    • Losses loom larger than gains – we give up on gains more readily than incur losses. A reason why people cling on to losing propositions for long and end of losing even more rather than exit early to cut losses!
    • A luxury becomes a necessity over a period of time as we get used to it.

There is a lot more to read and learn from this book, which is currently #1 best seller under Cognitive Psychology eTextbooks in Amazon. I have just provided an appetizer here and the book will be the main course. And I promise the main course will be much better than the appetizer. Go for it!

Sapiens & Home Deus: Amazing duo

The first book I read on anthropology was Guns, Germs & Steel, way back in 2005. While I enjoyed the insights and talked about it for a long time, it was not yet time for me to develop my reading habit. So, it took half a dozen years before I started on the next anthropology book – Collapse, incidentally by the same author Jared Diamond. By this time I was quite deep into reading non-fiction and a steady stream of great books enriched my knowledge across history and anthropology. Special mention among them would go to The Naked Ape and Origin of Species for being focused on anthropology.

By the end of 2017, I became a believer of science and encountered two enlightening books by Yuval Noah Harari that took my understanding to the next level. Sapiens gave concrete shape to the vague idea I had around how humans came to rule the world. And its sequel Home Deus painted a plausible picture of what future holds for us! It was sheer awesomeness to realize that the beginning of history was only 70,000 years ago with cognitive revolution. And how lucky we are to have gotten the accidental genetic mutations that changed inner wiring of our brains! It is difficult to comprehend that before cognitive revolution, history was just biology, with human life following predetermined pattern like any other animal – dictated by instructions encoded in their DNA!

One should read the book to appreciate the profoundness. The insights at the end of the book are compelling, comparing conventional thinking with contemporary science.

Conventional Thinking Data Science
I am an individual Organisms (including us) are algorithms
My authentic self is completely free My decisions are shaped by genes and environmental pressures
I know things about myself that no one else can discover An external algorithm can theoretically know me better than I know myself

Now that I am wiser, what next? Time to embrace the prophecy and prepare for the future! I started learning TensorFlow and instantly understood that the future of programming is in machine learning. As I started appreciating science, I also realized that Mathematics enables science. Math skills are becoming increasingly key to success in computer science and programming.  And Math skills are fundamental to machine learning! Lot more to learn and that keeps life interesting!!!

Project Euler

After updating my personal programming environment in August 2017, I was looking for opportunities to keep myself in touch with technology. That’s when one of my colleagues mentioned about Project Euler – a series of challenging problems that require mathematical and programming skills. It is named after Leonhard Euler, a Swiss mathematician, physicist, astronomer, logician and engineer, who made important and influential discoveries in many branches of mathematics, such as infinitesimal calculus and graph theory.

What started as a sub-section on mathschallenge.net in October 2001 has become an independent domain with more than 780,000 registered users having solved at least one problem. The site currently has 623 problems with a new problem added every fortnight. While most of the problems are straightforward, it is practically impossible to solve them without a computer because of the large numbers and computations involved. So, it is a marriage of mathematics and programming – bingo, what I was looking for!

Now then, one can choose to use any programming language to solve the problems. With Java and Python in my toolkit, I started with solving the problems using both of them. After just a couple of solutions, I realized that Python was way more effective and efficient. A solution in Java typically took twice as much time as Python due to several reasons – code verbosity, compilation / run time, functional programming and relatively vast math libraries available in Python, among others. So, I quickly dropped Java and stuck to writing code only in Python. Every problem expects a specific number as an answer, you type it in the answer box and eureka – you got it!

I don’t consider myself a quick programmer, my forte is discipline, patience and perseverance. I may take twice or even longer time than others to complete anything. But once I put my mind onto something, determination takes over and I invariably get it done. I usually don’t expect my programs to compile and run perfectly the first time. But the Project Euler answer box accepted my response as the right one in the first attempt for several problems. After all, I am a better programmer that I imagined!

I started with solving the first problem on 25th August 2017 and was solving at least 8 problems every weekend initially. That was when the difficulty level was at 5%. As the difficulty level went up, the rate of solving problems kept going down. That’s fine, I am not a Math genius and I was learning new Math concepts and Python libraries. By October 20th, I had solved 57 problems that put me in the Top 5% in terms of the number of problems solved.

My solutions are usually the brute force type. The purists will not like them. I will get there one day when I put my mind to it. For now, I just enjoy the excitement of seeing me getting the right answer.

Finally, why am I posting this now? After 20th October, I went into hibernation from Project Euler with my weekends taken up for the brevet season starting November 2017 to January 2018. After a gap of five months, I solved a couple of problems during the last week of March 2018 and this time wanted to jot down my experience before it becomes too stale. With the complexity level of problems having significantly increased and with so many conflicting priorities requiring my attention, I am not sure how many I will get to solve.

There are so many things to do and so little time in hand… Santh – that’s life and learn to deal with it!!!

Books 2017

As I wrote the blog on books I enjoyed in 2016, the realization stuck that I had slipped from reading habit during the previous year and a half. After finishing more than two dozen books each in 2013 and 2014, I had read only a couple of them in 2015. While I thought it was primarily due to extensive time spent during the weekends for cycling / running / recovery time, it also coincided with my taking up a new job towards the end of 2014. It took another year to sense knowledge debt building up again as my effectiveness as a speaker and motivator for my teams diminished a bit. When I read a book on leadership or anthropology, I immediately relate it to events around me and apply some of the learnings. This happens sub-consciously and I realized it only when while introspecting on recently diminished effectiveness.

In April 2017, I made efforts to restart my reading habit and made one of the best investments in recent times when I bought Kindle Paperwhite. I would later know from “The Everything Store” on strategic thought process from Jeff Bezos and Amazon that went in building an eBook Reader that would be affordable with a comprehensive book store behind it. I can vouch for it after using it for about ten months. You can pretty much find any English book ever published  and at a price that is most competitive! With backlight, I can now read without disturbing the rest of my family and e-ink technology lets Kindle run for days together on a single charge! I might sound like an Amazon marketer, but really admire the value Kindle brings with it!!!

I started with “Great by Choice”, a book by Jim Collins whose “Good to Great” was one of the books that got me interested in non-fiction. It was on familiar Jim Collins style and I could relate to some of the principles that I always followed in my life. No wonder I am great! – just kidding. It was just reassuring to know that some of my principles are good for long-term success. The quote from Roald Amundsen, the first man to The South Pole will always be etched in my memory: “Victory awaits him who has everything in order – luck people call it. Defeat is certain for him who has neglected to take the necessary precaution in time; this is called bad luck”.

From “Great by  Choice”, I got reference to another couple of fantastic books that demonstrated Jim Collin’s theory about the best leaders being more disciplined, more empirical and more paranoid. They were the next books I read – “Scott And Amundsen: The Last Place on Earth” and “Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Everest Disaster”.

It was then time for “Losing the Signal: The Untold Story Behind the Extraordinary Rise and Spectacular Fall of BlackBerry”. I got this from reading recommendations given by one of the senior leaders in my organization.

After my Europe trip, I wanted to know more about the history of Europe and particularly on what happened to Roman Civilization. It took almost four months to complete all the six volumes of “The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire” written by Edward Gibbon in 1770. A true classic like “The Origin of Species” by Charles Darwin and worth the effort.

After immersing in history for several months, I wanted to read about some contemporary achievements and went back to the reading recommendations. I read books on two of the modern great companies on Technology space – “The Everything Store: Jeff Bezos and the Age of Amazon” and “The Google Story”. In between, I also finished “Hit Refresh: The Quest to Rediscover Microsoft’s Soul and Imagine a Better Future for Everyone” within a few weeks of Satya Nadella releasing it. All of them reinforced the need for discipline, work ethic and team work – there is no short cut to success! That rounded up 2017, a fulfilling year for reading good books. As I write this, I already finished reading “The Great Convergence” that I got referred from Hit Refresh. More about that when I write about by 2018 experience.

My reading list from 2017:

Hit Refresh: The Quest to Rediscover Microsoft’s Soul and Imagine a Better Future for Everyone Satya Nadella
The Google Story David A. Vise
The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (Edited and Abridged): Abridged Edition Edward Gibbon
The Everything Store: Jeff Bezos and the Age of Amazon Brad Stone
Losing the Signal: The Untold Story Behind the Extraordinary Rise and Spectacular Fall of BlackBerry Jacquie McNish
Sean Silcoff
Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Everest Disaster Jon Krakauer
Scott And Amundsen: The Last Place on Earth Roland Huntford
Great by Choice: Uncertainty, Chaos and Luck – Why Some Thrive Despite Them All Jim Collins